Northern Africa: Upper-middle income vs Zimbabwe: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights over time
- Northern Africa: Upper-middle income
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 5.8 against 4.77 in Northern Africa: Upper-middle income, a difference of 1.03.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Northern Africa: Upper-middle income's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Northern Africa: Upper-middle income ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 83 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa: Upper-middle income | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.71 | 5.08 | 2.37 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 3.75 | 5.74 | 1.99 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights, Northern Africa: Upper-middle income or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 5.8 against 4.77 in Northern Africa: Upper-middle income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights between Northern Africa: Upper-middle income and Zimbabwe?
- 1.03, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa: Upper-middle income and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Northern Africa: Upper-middle income and Zimbabwe rank globally for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
- Northern Africa: Upper-middle income ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 83 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.