Republic of Moldova vs Tanzania, United Republic of: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights

Republic of Moldova
1.46
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
1.43
in 2024
Republic of Moldova rank
101st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
104th

SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.511.52201520192024

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 1.46 against 1.43 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.03.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Republic of Moldova ranks 101st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 104th of 186 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2010s 0.878 1.63 0.756 Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.844 1.43 0.586 Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights, Republic of Moldova or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Republic of Moldova, at 1.46 against 1.43 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights between Republic of Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.03, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Republic of Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
Republic of Moldova ranks 101st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 104th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs Tanzania, United Republic of: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/moldova/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/moldova/tanzania/">Republic of Moldova vs Tanzania, United Republic of: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
269 places, 2,688 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.