Guinea-Bissau vs World excluding BRICS: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights

Guinea-Bissau
4.5
in 2024
World excluding BRICS
3.53
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
37th
World excluding BRICS rank
40th

SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • World excluding BRICS
012345201520192024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 4.5 against 3.53 in World excluding BRICS, a difference of 0.97.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.3 times World excluding BRICS's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was World excluding BRICS ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 37th and World excluding BRICS ranks 40th of 186 countries.

World excluding BRICS has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau World excluding BRICS Difference Ahead
2010s 2.72 3.02 0.3 World excluding BRICS
2020s 3.33 3.34 0.002 World excluding BRICS

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights, Guinea-Bissau or World excluding BRICS?
Guinea-Bissau, at 4.5 against 3.53 in World excluding BRICS as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights between Guinea-Bissau and World excluding BRICS?
0.97, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and World excluding BRICS?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and World excluding BRICS rank globally for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 37th and World excluding BRICS ranks 40th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs World excluding BRICS: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/guinea-bissau/world-excluding-brics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/guinea-bissau/world-excluding-brics/">Guinea-Bissau vs World excluding BRICS: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
269 places, 2,688 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.