Eastern Europe vs Russia: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights over time
- Eastern Europe
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 3.71 against 2.78 in Eastern Europe, a difference of 0.93.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.3 times Eastern Europe's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.
Eastern Europe ranks 51st and Russia ranks 48th of 83 groups.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Europe | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.79 | 2.23 | 0.432 | Russia |
| 2020s | 2.53 | 3.3 | 0.768 | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights, Eastern Europe or Russia?
- Russia, at 3.71 against 2.78 in Eastern Europe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights between Eastern Europe and Russia?
- 0.93, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Russia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Eastern Europe and Russia rank globally for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
- Eastern Europe ranks 51st and Russia ranks 48th of 83 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.