Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights

Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income
9.11
in 2024
Iran, Islamic Republic of
10
in 2024
Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income rank
2nd
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
1st

SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights over time

  • Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income
  • Iran, Islamic Republic of
0246810201520192024

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 10 against 9.11 in Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income, a difference of 0.89.

That makes Iran, Islamic Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.

Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 2nd and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 1st of 83 groups.

Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income Iran, Islamic Republic of Difference Ahead
2010s 8.51 9.7 1.18 Iran, Islamic Republic of
2020s 9.15 9.98 0.836 Iran, Islamic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights, Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 10 against 9.11 in Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights between Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
0.89, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 2nd and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 1st of 83 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/eastern-asia-upper-middle-income/iran-islamic-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/eastern-asia-upper-middle-income/iran-islamic-rep/">Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
269 places, 2,688 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.