Eastern Asia: High income vs Sri Lanka: SDG indicator 8.8.2 … freedom of association and collective bargaining

Eastern Asia: High income
2.47
in 2024
Sri Lanka
3.13
in 2024
Eastern Asia: High income rank
56th
Sri Lanka rank
55th

SDG indicator 8.8.2 … freedom of association and collective bargaining over time

  • Eastern Asia: High income
  • Sri Lanka
0123201520192024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 3.13 against 2.47 in Eastern Asia: High income, a difference of 0.66.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.3 times Eastern Asia: High income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Eastern Asia: High income ahead.

Eastern Asia: High income ranks 56th and Sri Lanka ranks 55th of 83 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Eastern Asia: High income averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Asia: High income Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s 2.58 2.33 0.248 Eastern Asia: High income
2020s 2.21 2.83 0.616 Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights, Eastern Asia: High income or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 3.13 against 2.47 in Eastern Asia: High income as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights between Eastern Asia: High income and Sri Lanka?
0.66, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia: High income and Sri Lanka?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Eastern Asia: High income and Sri Lanka rank globally for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
Eastern Asia: High income ranks 56th and Sri Lanka ranks 55th of 83 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Asia: High income vs Sri Lanka: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/eastern-asia-high-income/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/eastern-asia-high-income/sri-lanka/">Eastern Asia: High income vs Sri Lanka: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
269 places, 2,688 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.