Brazil vs World: Low income: SDG indicator 8.8.2 … freedom of association and collective bargaining
SDG indicator 8.8.2 … freedom of association and collective bargaining over time
- Brazil
- World: Low income
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 3.25 against 2.54 in World: Low income, a difference of 0.71.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times World: Low income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was World: Low income ahead.
Brazil ranks 52nd and World: Low income ranks 54th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and World: Low income in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | World: Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.06 | 2.52 | 0.458 | World: Low income |
| 2020s | 2.8 | 2.44 | 0.364 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights, Brazil or World: Low income?
- Brazil, at 3.25 against 2.54 in World: Low income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights between Brazil and World: Low income?
- 0.71, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and World: Low income?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and World: Low income rank globally for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
- Brazil ranks 52nd and World: Low income ranks 54th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.