Brazil vs Democratic Republic of Congo: SDG indicator 8.8.2 … freedom of association and collective bargaining

Brazil
3.25
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo
3.16
in 2024
Brazil rank
52nd
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
54th

SDG indicator 8.8.2 … freedom of association and collective bargaining over time

  • Brazil
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
0123201520192024

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 3.25 against 3.16 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.09.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Brazil ranks 52nd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 54th of 186 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
2010s 2.06 3.15 1.09 Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 2.8 3.16 0.356 Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights, Brazil or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Brazil, at 3.25 against 3.16 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights between Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo?
0.09, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
Brazil ranks 52nd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 54th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Democratic Republic of Congo: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/brazil/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/brazil/congo-dem-rep/">Brazil vs Democratic Republic of Congo: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
269 places, 2,688 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.