Azerbaijan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights

Azerbaijan
0.54
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.68
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
147th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
145th

SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.20.40.6201520192024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.68 against 0.54 in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.14.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.3 times Azerbaijan's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 147th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 145th of 186 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2010s 0.54 0.68 0.14 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.54 0.68 0.14 Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights, Azerbaijan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.68 against 0.54 in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights between Azerbaijan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.14, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
Azerbaijan ranks 147th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 145th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/azerbaijan/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/azerbaijan/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Azerbaijan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
269 places, 2,688 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.