Asia and the Pacific: High income vs Caribbean: SDG indicator 8.8.2 … freedom of association and collective bargaining
SDG indicator 8.8.2 … freedom of association and collective bargaining over time
- Asia and the Pacific: High income
- Caribbean
How they compare
Asia and the Pacific: High income currently reports 2.23 against 1.67 in Caribbean, a difference of 0.56.
That makes Asia and the Pacific: High income's figure about 1.3 times Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Caribbean ahead.
Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 65th and Caribbean ranks 68th of 83 groups.
Asia and the Pacific: High income has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia and the Pacific: High income | Caribbean | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.34 | 1.7 | 0.642 | Asia and the Pacific: High income |
| 2020s | 2.02 | 1.57 | 0.448 | Asia and the Pacific: High income |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights, Asia and the Pacific: High income or Caribbean?
- Asia and the Pacific: High income, at 2.23 against 1.67 in Caribbean as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights between Asia and the Pacific: High income and Caribbean?
- 0.56, with Asia and the Pacific: High income ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: High income and Caribbean?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Asia and the Pacific: High income and Caribbean rank globally for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
- Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 65th and Caribbean ranks 68th of 83 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.