Arab States: Lower-middle income vs Equatorial Guinea: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights

Arab States: Lower-middle income
3.73
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
4.8
in 2024
Arab States: Lower-middle income rank
34th
Equatorial Guinea rank
35th

SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights over time

  • Arab States: Lower-middle income
  • Equatorial Guinea
012345201520192024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 4.8 against 3.73 in Arab States: Lower-middle income, a difference of 1.07.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Arab States: Lower-middle income's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Arab States: Lower-middle income ranks 34th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 35th of 83 groups.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab States: Lower-middle income Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2010s 3.55 4.62 1.07 Equatorial Guinea
2020s 3.63 4.69 1.06 Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights, Arab States: Lower-middle income or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 4.8 against 3.73 in Arab States: Lower-middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights between Arab States: Lower-middle income and Equatorial Guinea?
1.07, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab States: Lower-middle income and Equatorial Guinea?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Arab States: Lower-middle income and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for sdg indicator 8.8.2: level of national compliance with labour rights?
Arab States: Lower-middle income ranks 34th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 35th of 83 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab States: Lower-middle income vs Equatorial Guinea: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/arab-states-lower-middle-income/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-8-2-level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of/arab-states-lower-middle-income/equatorial-guinea/">Arab States: Lower-middle income vs Equatorial Guinea: SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
269 places, 2,688 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The indicator measures the level of national compliance with fundamental rights at work (freedom of association and collective bargaining, FACB) for all ILO member states based on six international ILO supervisory body textual sources and also on national legislation. It is based on the coding of textual sources against a list of evaluation criteria and then converting the coding into indicators. The indicator has a range from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). This indicator is not intended as a tool to compare compliance among ILO member States. It should specifically be noted that reporting obligations of an ILO member State to the ILO's supervisory system and thus ILO textual sources are different for ratifying and non‐ratifying ILO member States.