Romania vs Sri Lanka: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in
SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in over time
- Romania
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 17.23 against 16.51 in Romania, a difference of 0.72.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 52nd and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 123 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.43 | 26.08 | 9.65 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 16.77 | 18.87 | 2.1 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in, Romania or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 17.23 against 16.51 in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in between Romania and Sri Lanka?
- 0.72, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sri Lanka?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Romania and Sri Lanka rank globally for sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in?
- Romania ranks 52nd and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The share of youth not in employment, education, or training (also known as the NEET rate) conveys the number of young persons not in education, employment or training as a percentage of the total youth population. It provides a measure of youth who are outside the educational system, not in training and not in employment, and thus serves as a broader measure of potential youth labour market entrants than youth unemployment, since it also includes young persons outside the labour force not in education or training. This indicator is also a better measure of the current universe of potential youth labour market entrants compared to the youth inactivity rate, as the latter includes those youth who are not in the labour force and are in education, and thus cannot be considered currently available for work. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.