Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income vs Peru: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in

Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income
20.41
in 2027
Peru
22.78
in 2022
Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income rank
32nd
Peru rank
30th

SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in over time

  • Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income
  • Peru
0102030200020132027

How they compare

Peru currently reports 22.78 against 20.41 in Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income, a difference of 2.37.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income ahead.

Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income ranks 32nd and Peru ranks 30th of 87 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 26.36 18.49 7.87 Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income
2010s 25.74 16.9 8.84 Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income
2020s 22.28 23.72 1.44 Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in, Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income or Peru?
Peru, at 22.78 against 20.41 in Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income as of 2022.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in between Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income and Peru?
2.37, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income and Peru?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income and Peru rank globally for sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in?
Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income ranks 32nd and Peru ranks 30th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income vs Peru: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/europe-and-central-asia-lower-middle-income/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/europe-and-central-asia-lower-middle-income/peru/">Europe and Central Asia: Lower-middle income vs Peru: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
210 places, 4,103 data points, 2000–2027
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The share of youth not in employment, education, or training (also known as the NEET rate) conveys the number of young persons not in education, employment or training as a percentage of the total youth population. It provides a measure of youth who are outside the educational system, not in training and not in employment, and thus serves as a broader measure of potential youth labour market entrants than youth unemployment, since it also includes young persons outside the labour force not in education or training. This indicator is also a better measure of the current universe of potential youth labour market entrants compared to the youth inactivity rate, as the latter includes those youth who are not in the labour force and are in education, and thus cannot be considered currently available for work. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.