Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income vs Georgia: SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training

Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income
15.49
in 2027
Georgia
15.29
in 2025
Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income rank
61st
Georgia rank
60th

SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training over time

  • Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income
  • Georgia
0102030200520162027

How they compare

Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income currently reports 15.49 against 15.29 in Georgia, a difference of 0.2.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Georgia ahead.

Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income ranks 61st and Georgia ranks 60th of 87 groups.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income Georgia Difference Ahead
2010s 15.8 28.02 12.22 Georgia
2020s 15.15 19.24 4.09 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in, Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income or Georgia?
Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income, at 15.49 against 15.29 in Georgia as of 2027.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in between Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income and Georgia?
0.2, with Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income and Georgia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
How do Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income and Georgia rank globally for sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in?
Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income ranks 61st and Georgia ranks 60th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income vs Georgia: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/eastern-europe-upper-middle-income/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/eastern-europe-upper-middle-income/georgia/">Eastern Europe: Upper-middle income vs Georgia: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
210 places, 4,103 data points, 2000–2027
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The share of youth not in employment, education, or training (also known as the NEET rate) conveys the number of young persons not in education, employment or training as a percentage of the total youth population. It provides a measure of youth who are outside the educational system, not in training and not in employment, and thus serves as a broader measure of potential youth labour market entrants than youth unemployment, since it also includes young persons outside the labour force not in education or training. This indicator is also a better measure of the current universe of potential youth labour market entrants compared to the youth inactivity rate, as the latter includes those youth who are not in the labour force and are in education, and thus cannot be considered currently available for work. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.