Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income vs New Zealand: SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training

Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income
11.47
in 2027
New Zealand
12.78
in 2024
Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income rank
74th
New Zealand rank
76th

SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training over time

  • Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income
  • New Zealand
051015200420152027

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 12.78 against 11.47 in Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income, a difference of 1.31.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income ahead.

Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 74th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 87 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 16.83 11.66 5.16 Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income
2010s 13.11 12.41 0.7027 Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income
2020s 11.1 12.17 1.07 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in, Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 12.78 against 11.47 in Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in between Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income and New Zealand?
1.31, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income and New Zealand?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income and New Zealand rank globally for sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in?
Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 74th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income vs New Zealand: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/eastern-asia-upper-middle-income/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/eastern-asia-upper-middle-income/new-zealand/">Eastern Asia: Upper-middle income vs New Zealand: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
210 places, 4,103 data points, 2000–2027
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The share of youth not in employment, education, or training (also known as the NEET rate) conveys the number of young persons not in education, employment or training as a percentage of the total youth population. It provides a measure of youth who are outside the educational system, not in training and not in employment, and thus serves as a broader measure of potential youth labour market entrants than youth unemployment, since it also includes young persons outside the labour force not in education or training. This indicator is also a better measure of the current universe of potential youth labour market entrants compared to the youth inactivity rate, as the latter includes those youth who are not in the labour force and are in education, and thus cannot be considered currently available for work. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.