Eastern Asia: High income vs Poland: SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training

Eastern Asia: High income
5.77
in 2027
Poland
10.09
in 2025
Eastern Asia: High income rank
87th
Poland rank
90th

SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training over time

  • Eastern Asia: High income
  • Poland
5101520200020132027

How they compare

Poland currently reports 10.09 against 5.77 in Eastern Asia: High income, a difference of 4.32.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.7 times Eastern Asia: High income's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Eastern Asia: High income ranks 87th and Poland ranks 90th of 87 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Asia: High income Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 7.82 12.82 5 Poland
2010s 7.51 12.07 4.56 Poland
2020s 6.34 10.66 4.32 Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in, Eastern Asia: High income or Poland?
Poland, at 10.09 against 5.77 in Eastern Asia: High income as of 2025.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in between Eastern Asia: High income and Poland?
4.32, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia: High income and Poland?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Eastern Asia: High income and Poland rank globally for sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in?
Eastern Asia: High income ranks 87th and Poland ranks 90th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Asia: High income vs Poland: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/eastern-asia-high-income/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/eastern-asia-high-income/poland/">Eastern Asia: High income vs Poland: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
210 places, 4,103 data points, 2000–2027
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The share of youth not in employment, education, or training (also known as the NEET rate) conveys the number of young persons not in education, employment or training as a percentage of the total youth population. It provides a measure of youth who are outside the educational system, not in training and not in employment, and thus serves as a broader measure of potential youth labour market entrants than youth unemployment, since it also includes young persons outside the labour force not in education or training. This indicator is also a better measure of the current universe of potential youth labour market entrants compared to the youth inactivity rate, as the latter includes those youth who are not in the labour force and are in education, and thus cannot be considered currently available for work. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.