Central and Western Asia: High income vs Israel: SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training

Central and Western Asia: High income
14.98
in 2027
Israel
15.27
in 2024
Central and Western Asia: High income rank
63rd
Israel rank
62nd

SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training over time

  • Central and Western Asia: High income
  • Israel
051015200520162027

How they compare

Israel currently reports 15.27 against 14.98 in Central and Western Asia: High income, a difference of 0.29.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Central and Western Asia: High income ahead.

Central and Western Asia: High income ranks 63rd and Israel ranks 62nd of 87 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Central and Western Asia: High income averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central and Western Asia: High income Israel Difference Ahead
2010s 14.39 14.19 0.195 Central and Western Asia: High income
2020s 15.49 15.7 0.2102 Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in, Central and Western Asia: High income or Israel?
Israel, at 15.27 against 14.98 in Central and Western Asia: High income as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in between Central and Western Asia: High income and Israel?
0.29, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Western Asia: High income and Israel?
13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
How do Central and Western Asia: High income and Israel rank globally for sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in?
Central and Western Asia: High income ranks 63rd and Israel ranks 62nd of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central and Western Asia: High income vs Israel: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/central-and-western-asia-high-income/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/central-and-western-asia-high-income/israel/">Central and Western Asia: High income vs Israel: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
210 places, 4,103 data points, 2000–2027
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The share of youth not in employment, education, or training (also known as the NEET rate) conveys the number of young persons not in education, employment or training as a percentage of the total youth population. It provides a measure of youth who are outside the educational system, not in training and not in employment, and thus serves as a broader measure of potential youth labour market entrants than youth unemployment, since it also includes young persons outside the labour force not in education or training. This indicator is also a better measure of the current universe of potential youth labour market entrants compared to the youth inactivity rate, as the latter includes those youth who are not in the labour force and are in education, and thus cannot be considered currently available for work. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.