Caribbean vs World: Upper-middle income excluding China: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in

Caribbean
20.62
in 2027
World: Upper-middle income excluding China
21.33
in 2027
Caribbean rank
28th
World: Upper-middle income excluding China rank
26th

SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in over time

  • Caribbean
  • World: Upper-middle income excluding China
0102030200520162027

How they compare

World: Upper-middle income excluding China currently reports 21.33 against 20.62 in Caribbean, a difference of 0.71.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was World: Upper-middle income excluding China ahead.

Caribbean ranks 28th and World: Upper-middle income excluding China ranks 26th of 87 countries.

World: Upper-middle income excluding China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Caribbean World: Upper-middle income excluding China Difference Ahead
2000s 21.45 25.53 4.09 World: Upper-middle income excluding China
2010s 21.39 22.87 1.48 World: Upper-middle income excluding China
2020s 21.22 21.74 0.5194 World: Upper-middle income excluding China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in, Caribbean or World: Upper-middle income excluding China?
World: Upper-middle income excluding China, at 21.33 against 20.62 in Caribbean as of 2027.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in between Caribbean and World: Upper-middle income excluding China?
0.71, with World: Upper-middle income excluding China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and World: Upper-middle income excluding China?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Caribbean and World: Upper-middle income excluding China rank globally for sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in?
Caribbean ranks 28th and World: Upper-middle income excluding China ranks 26th of 87 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Caribbean vs World: Upper-middle income excluding China: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/caribbean/world-upper-middle-income-excluding-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/caribbean/world-upper-middle-income-excluding-china/">Caribbean vs World: Upper-middle income excluding China: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
210 places, 4,103 data points, 2000–2027
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The share of youth not in employment, education, or training (also known as the NEET rate) conveys the number of young persons not in education, employment or training as a percentage of the total youth population. It provides a measure of youth who are outside the educational system, not in training and not in employment, and thus serves as a broader measure of potential youth labour market entrants than youth unemployment, since it also includes young persons outside the labour force not in education or training. This indicator is also a better measure of the current universe of potential youth labour market entrants compared to the youth inactivity rate, as the latter includes those youth who are not in the labour force and are in education, and thus cannot be considered currently available for work. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.