Brazil vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income: SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training

Brazil
18.7
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income
19.03
in 2027
Brazil rank
47th
Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income rank
46th

SDG indicator 8.6.1 … years not in education, employment or training over time

  • Brazil
  • Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income
0102030200120142027

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income currently reports 19.03 against 18.7 in Brazil, a difference of 0.33.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 47th and Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income ranks 46th of 123 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 18.92 18.1 0.8202 Brazil
2010s 22.32 18.93 3.39 Brazil
2020s 21.5 19.15 2.35 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in, Brazil or Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income?
Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income, at 19.03 against 18.7 in Brazil as of 2027.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in between Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income?
0.33, with Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income rank globally for sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in?
Brazil ranks 47th and Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income ranks 46th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/brazil/sub-saharan-africa-lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/brazil/sub-saharan-africa-lower-middle-income/">Brazil vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Lower-middle income: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
210 places, 4,103 data points, 2000–2027
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The share of youth not in employment, education, or training (also known as the NEET rate) conveys the number of young persons not in education, employment or training as a percentage of the total youth population. It provides a measure of youth who are outside the educational system, not in training and not in employment, and thus serves as a broader measure of potential youth labour market entrants than youth unemployment, since it also includes young persons outside the labour force not in education or training. This indicator is also a better measure of the current universe of potential youth labour market entrants compared to the youth inactivity rate, as the latter includes those youth who are not in the labour force and are in education, and thus cannot be considered currently available for work. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.