Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Botswana: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in

Asia and the Pacific: Low income
43.68
in 2027
Botswana
38
in 2024
Asia and the Pacific: Low income rank
1st
Botswana rank
2nd

SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Low income
  • Botswana
010203040200520162027

How they compare

Asia and the Pacific: Low income currently reports 43.68 against 38 in Botswana, a difference of 5.68.

That makes Asia and the Pacific: Low income's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Botswana ahead.

Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 2nd of 87 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Asia and the Pacific: Low income averaged higher in 2 and Botswana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Low income Botswana Difference Ahead
2000s 29.44 39 9.57 Botswana
2010s 32.67 31.98 0.685 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2020s 41.92 36.98 4.94 Asia and the Pacific: Low income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in, Asia and the Pacific: Low income or Botswana?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income, at 43.68 against 38 in Botswana as of 2027.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in between Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Botswana?
5.68, with Asia and the Pacific: Low income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Botswana?
8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Botswana rank globally for sdg indicator 8.6.1: proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 2nd of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Botswana: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-6-1-proportion-of-youth-aged-15-to-24-years-not-in-education-employment/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/botswana/">Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Botswana: SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
210 places, 4,103 data points, 2000–2027
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. The share of youth not in employment, education, or training (also known as the NEET rate) conveys the number of young persons not in education, employment or training as a percentage of the total youth population. It provides a measure of youth who are outside the educational system, not in training and not in employment, and thus serves as a broader measure of potential youth labour market entrants than youth unemployment, since it also includes young persons outside the labour force not in education or training. This indicator is also a better measure of the current universe of potential youth labour market entrants compared to the youth inactivity rate, as the latter includes those youth who are not in the labour force and are in education, and thus cannot be considered currently available for work. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.