Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP

Hong Kong, China
3.23
in 2027
Latvia
3.2
in 2027
Hong Kong, China rank
43rd
Latvia rank
45th

SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Latvia
-50510200020132027

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 3.23 against 3.2 in Latvia, a difference of 0.03.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 28 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd and Latvia ranks 45th of 188 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 2.98 5.66 2.67 Latvia
2010s 1.88 2.43 0.5486 Latvia
2020s 2.05 2.34 0.2864 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 8.2.1: annual growth rate of output per worker, gdp, Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
Hong Kong, China, at 3.23 against 3.2 in Latvia as of 2027.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.2.1: annual growth rate of output per worker, gdp between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
0.03, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
28 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2027.
How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for sdg indicator 8.2.1: annual growth rate of output per worker, gdp?
Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd and Latvia ranks 45th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international dollars at PPP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-2-1-annual-growth-rate-of-output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2021/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-8-2-1-annual-growth-rate-of-output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2021/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/">Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international dollars at PPP
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 7,704 data points, 2000–2027
Last refreshed

The series is part of the ILO modelled estimates and is harmonized to account for differences in national data and scope of coverage, collection and tabulation methodologies as well as for other country-specific factors. This indicator conveys the annual growth rates of labour productivity. Labour productivity represents the total volume of output (measured in terms of Gross Domestic Product, GDP) produced per unit of labour (measured in terms of the number of employed persons) during a given time reference period. The indicator allows data users to assess GDP-to-labour input levels and growth rates over time, thus providing general information about the efficiency and quality of human capital in the production process for a given economic and social context, including other complementary inputs and innovations used in production. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.