How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?

5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

ASPIRE, published as Poverty Headcount reduction (%) - International Private Transfers -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Kyrgyzstan: Poverty Headcount reduction (%) - International Private Transfers

Q: Which has higher poverty headcount reduction (%) - international private transfers, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Kyrgyzstan?

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 86.5% against 77.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2017.

Q: What is the difference in poverty headcount reduction (%) - international private transfers between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?

9.5%, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.

Q: How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for poverty headcount reduction (%) - international private transfers?

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 27 countries.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

86.5%

in 2017

Kyrgyzstan

77.0%

in 2020

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank

5th

Kyrgyzstan rank

7th

Poverty Headcount reduction (%) - International Private Transfers over time

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
Kyrgyzstan

How they compare

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 86.5% against 77.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 9.5%.

That makes Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)'s figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has been ahead every year.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 27 countries.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)	Kyrgyzstan	Difference	Ahead
2000s	53.9%	2.4%	51.5%	Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
2010s	79.0%	42.5%	36.5%	Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher poverty headcount reduction (%) - international private transfers, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Kyrgyzstan?: Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 86.5% against 77.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2017.
What is the difference in poverty headcount reduction (%) - international private transfers between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?: 9.5%, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for poverty headcount reduction (%) - international private transfers?: Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?: ASPIRE, published as Poverty Headcount reduction (%) - International Private Transfers -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Kyrgyzstan: Poverty Headcount reduction (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/poverty-headcount-reduction-percent-international-private-transfers-extreme-poor-2-15-a/kosovo-unscr-1244/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/poverty-headcount-reduction-percent-international-private-transfers-extreme-poor-2-15-a/kosovo-unscr-1244/kyrgyz-republic/">Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Kyrgyzstan: Poverty Headcount reduction (%) - International Private Transfers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Poverty Headcount reduction (%) - International Private Transfers -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day)
Unit: <$2.15 a day
Source: ASPIRE
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Poverty headcount reduction due to International Private Transfers programs as % of pre-transfer poverty headcount