Dominican Republic vs Serbia: Poverty Gap reduction (%) - International Private Transfers - 1st
Dominican Republic
15.8%
in 2021
Serbia
11.3%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
11th
Serbia rank
14th
Poverty Gap reduction (%) - International Private Transfers - 1st over time
- Dominican Republic
- Serbia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 15.8% against 11.3% in Serbia, a difference of 4.5%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.4 times Serbia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 11th and Serbia ranks 14th of 27 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.2% | 5.9% | 13.3% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 16.1% | 12.9% | 3.3% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 15.8% | 8.5% | 7.3% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher poverty gap reduction (%) - international private transfers - 1st, Dominican Republic or Serbia?
- Dominican Republic, at 15.8% against 11.3% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in poverty gap reduction (%) - international private transfers - 1st between Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 4.5%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Serbia rank globally for poverty gap reduction (%) - international private transfers - 1st?
- Dominican Republic ranks 11th and Serbia ranks 14th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Poverty Gap reduction (%) - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction due to International Private Transfers programs as % of pre-transfer poverty gap