Denmark vs Norway: Potential labour force (current ILO definition - ICLS19)
Potential labour force (current ILO definition - ICLS19) over time
- Denmark
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 100.92 against 96.77 in Denmark, a difference of 4.15.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 34th and Norway ranks 33rd of 61 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 97.3 | 82.83 | 14.48 | Denmark |
| 2020s | 85.47 | 95.63 | 10.17 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potential labour force (current ilo definition - icls19), Denmark or Norway?
- Norway, at 100.92 against 96.77 in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potential labour force (current ilo definition - icls19) between Denmark and Norway?
- 4.15, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Norway?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Norway rank globally for potential labour force (current ilo definition - icls19)?
- Denmark ranks 34th and Norway ranks 33rd of 61 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Potential labour force (current ILO definition - ICLS19) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series includes only countries for which the 19th ICLS definitions are applied. The potential labour force refers to persons not in employment who express an interest in this form of work but for whom existing conditions limit their active job search and/or their availability. This group is used to calculate alternative measures of labour underutilization. For more information, refer to the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database description.