Peru vs South Africa: Population only receiving All Social Insurance (%) -urban
Peru
4.3%
in 2022
South Africa
2.4%
in 2021
Peru rank
31st
South Africa rank
34th
Population only receiving All Social Insurance (%) -urban over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4.3% against 2.4% in South Africa, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.8 times South Africa's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 34th of 40 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.9% | 2.0% | 7.9% | Peru |
| 2020s | 4.6% | 1.9% | 2.7% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population only receiving all social insurance (%) -urban, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 4.3% against 2.4% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in population only receiving all social insurance (%) -urban between Peru and South Africa?
- 1.9%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for population only receiving all social insurance (%) -urban?
- Peru ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 34th of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Population only receiving All Social Insurance (%) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population only receiving All Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)