Peru vs South Africa: Population only receiving All Social Insurance (%) -rural
Peru
0.3%
in 2022
South Africa
0.3%
in 2021
Peru rank
34th
South Africa rank
32nd
Population only receiving All Social Insurance (%) -rural over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Peru, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 32nd of 38 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.0% | 0.4% | 0.5% | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population only receiving all social insurance (%) -rural, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in population only receiving all social insurance (%) -rural between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for population only receiving all social insurance (%) -rural?
- Peru ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 32nd of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Population only receiving All Social Insurance (%) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population only receiving All Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)