Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Population only receiving All Social Insurance (%) -rural
Brazil
22.7%
in 2022
Sri Lanka
6.9%
in 2019
Brazil rank
13th
Sri Lanka rank
16th
Population only receiving All Social Insurance (%) -rural over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 22.7% against 6.9% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 15.8%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 3.3 times Sri Lanka's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 13th and Sri Lanka ranks 16th of 38 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.2% | 5.7% | 14.6% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 23.0% | 6.5% | 16.5% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population only receiving all social insurance (%) -rural, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Brazil, at 22.7% against 6.9% in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
- What is the difference in population only receiving all social insurance (%) -rural between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 15.8%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for population only receiving all social insurance (%) -rural?
- Brazil ranks 13th and Sri Lanka ranks 16th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Population only receiving All Social Insurance (%) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population only receiving All Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)