Peru vs South Africa: Population only receiving All Social Assistance (%) -rural
Peru
90.9%
in 2022
South Africa
88.6%
in 2021
Peru rank
2nd
South Africa rank
4th
Population only receiving All Social Assistance (%) -rural over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 90.9% against 88.6% in South Africa, a difference of 2.3%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 4th of 38 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 84.9% | 82.4% | 2.5% | Peru |
| 2020s | 93.9% | 89.3% | 4.7% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population only receiving all social assistance (%) -rural, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 90.9% against 88.6% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in population only receiving all social assistance (%) -rural between Peru and South Africa?
- 2.3%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for population only receiving all social assistance (%) -rural?
- Peru ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 4th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Population only receiving All Social Assistance (%) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population only receiving All Social Assistance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)