Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social
Kosovo
45.9%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
61.9%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
3rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
2nd
Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 61.9% against 45.9% in Kosovo, a difference of 16.0%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Kosovo's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 40 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.2% | 36.7% | 16.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 34.3% | 49.8% | 15.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 61.9% against 45.9% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 16.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social?
- Kosovo ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social Insurance (%, preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population only receiving All Social Insurance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)