Peru vs South Africa: Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social
Peru
90.2%
in 2022
South Africa
94.3%
in 2021
Peru rank
4th
South Africa rank
3rd
Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 94.3% against 90.2% in Peru, a difference of 4.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 40 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 87.8% | 90.0% | 2.2% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 87.5% | 94.6% | 7.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 94.3% against 90.2% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social between Peru and South Africa?
- 4.1%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving all social?
- Peru ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Population in the 1st quintile (poorest) only receiving All Social Assistance (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population only receiving All Social Assistance programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)