Maldives vs San Marino: Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre

Maldives
0.6739 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino
0.5566 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives rank
9th
San Marino rank
11th

Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre over time

  • Maldives
  • San Marino
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 0.6739 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.5566 1000 No per square kilometre in San Marino, a difference of 0.1173 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Maldives's figure about 1.2 times San Marino's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was San Marino ahead.

Maldives ranks 9th and San Marino ranks 11th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 2 and San Marino in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives San Marino Difference Ahead
1960s 0.039 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1582 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1192 1000 No per square kilometre San Marino
1970s 0.0765 1000 No per square kilometre 0.2325 1000 No per square kilometre 0.156 1000 No per square kilometre San Marino
1980s 0.1539 1000 No per square kilometre 0.3278 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1738 1000 No per square kilometre San Marino
1990s 0.2174 1000 No per square kilometre 0.3912 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1738 1000 No per square kilometre San Marino
2000s 0.3449 1000 No per square kilometre 0.4574 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1125 1000 No per square kilometre San Marino
2010s 0.5262 1000 No per square kilometre 0.5255 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 0.647 1000 No per square kilometre 0.5531 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0939 1000 No per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — urban population, per square kilometre, Maldives or San Marino?
Maldives, at 0.6739 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.5566 1000 No per square kilometre in San Marino as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — urban population, per square kilometre between Maldives and San Marino?
0.1173 1000 No per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and San Marino?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Maldives and San Marino rank globally for population - est. & proj. — urban population, per square kilometre?
Maldives ranks 9th and San Marino ranks 11th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs San Marino: Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-urban-population-per-square-kilometre/maldives/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-urban-population-per-square-kilometre/maldives/san-marino/">Maldives vs San Marino: Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 11,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.