Congo vs New Caledonia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre

Congo
0.0124 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0118 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
163rd
New Caledonia rank
164th

Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • New Caledonia
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0124 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0118 1000 No per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Congo ranks 163rd and New Caledonia ranks 164th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.002 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre 0.005 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.0066 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0081 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.0095 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0101 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0119 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0115 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — urban population, per square kilometre, Congo or New Caledonia?
Congo, at 0.0124 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0118 1000 No per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — urban population, per square kilometre between Congo and New Caledonia?
0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and New Caledonia rank globally for population - est. & proj. — urban population, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 163rd and New Caledonia ranks 164th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs New Caledonia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-urban-population-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-urban-population-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/new-caledonia/">Congo vs New Caledonia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 11,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.