Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Melanesia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.88 % change on previous year
in 2050
Melanesia
2.76 % change on previous year
in 2050
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
2nd
Melanesia rank
5th
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Melanesia
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 2.88 % change on previous year against 2.76 % change on previous year in Melanesia, a difference of 0.12 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 100 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Melanesia ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 2nd and Melanesia ranks 5th of 29 groups.
Across the 11 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 8 and Melanesia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 4.58 % change on previous year | 6.66 % change on previous year | 2.07 % change on previous year | Melanesia |
| 1960s | 5.33 % change on previous year | 7.8 % change on previous year | 2.47 % change on previous year | Melanesia |
| 1970s | 5.01 % change on previous year | 5.19 % change on previous year | 0.1719 % change on previous year | Melanesia |
| 1980s | 4.51 % change on previous year | 3.53 % change on previous year | 0.9714 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 5.23 % change on previous year | 2.13 % change on previous year | 3.09 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 3.74 % change on previous year | 2.22 % change on previous year | 1.52 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 3.66 % change on previous year | 2.27 % change on previous year | 1.39 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 3.79 % change on previous year | 2.55 % change on previous year | 1.24 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2030s | 3.49 % change on previous year | 2.89 % change on previous year | 0.5992 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2040s | 3.11 % change on previous year | 2.89 % change on previous year | 0.217 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2050s | 2.88 % change on previous year | 2.76 % change on previous year | 0.1147 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population - est. & proj. — urban population, annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Melanesia?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 2.88 % change on previous year against 2.76 % change on previous year in Melanesia as of 2050.
- What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — urban population, annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Melanesia?
- 0.12 % change on previous year, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Melanesia?
- 100 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2050.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Melanesia rank globally for population - est. & proj. — urban population, annual growth rate?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 2nd and Melanesia ranks 5th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.