Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2.81 % change on previous year
in 2050
Melanesia
2.76 % change on previous year
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
3rd
Melanesia rank
5th
Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate over time
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- Melanesia
How they compare
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 2.81 % change on previous year against 2.76 % change on previous year in Melanesia, a difference of 0.05 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 100 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Melanesia ahead.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd and Melanesia ranks 5th of 29 groups.
Across the 11 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 9 and Melanesia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 4.38 % change on previous year | 6.66 % change on previous year | 2.27 % change on previous year | Melanesia |
| 1960s | 5.1 % change on previous year | 7.8 % change on previous year | 2.7 % change on previous year | Melanesia |
| 1970s | 5.26 % change on previous year | 5.19 % change on previous year | 0.0705 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 1980s | 4.7 % change on previous year | 3.53 % change on previous year | 1.16 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 1990s | 14.9 % change on previous year | 2.13 % change on previous year | 12.77 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2000s | 3.02 % change on previous year | 2.22 % change on previous year | 0.802 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2010s | 3.39 % change on previous year | 2.27 % change on previous year | 1.12 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2020s | 3.26 % change on previous year | 2.55 % change on previous year | 0.7131 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2030s | 3.23 % change on previous year | 2.89 % change on previous year | 0.3368 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2040s | 3 % change on previous year | 2.89 % change on previous year | 0.107 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2050s | 2.81 % change on previous year | 2.76 % change on previous year | 0.0437 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population - est. & proj. — urban population, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Melanesia?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 2.81 % change on previous year against 2.76 % change on previous year in Melanesia as of 2050.
- What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — urban population, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia?
- 0.05 % change on previous year, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia?
- 100 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2050.
- How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia rank globally for population - est. & proj. — urban population, annual growth rate?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd and Melanesia ranks 5th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.