Bhutan vs New Zealand: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square

Bhutan
0.0096 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0099 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
164th
New Zealand rank
162nd

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square over time

  • Bhutan
  • New Zealand
0.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0099 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0096 1000 No per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Bhutan ranks 164th and New Zealand ranks 162nd of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre 0.005 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.0037 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0058 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.0051 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.0065 1000 No per square kilometre 0.007 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.0078 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.0089 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0089 1000 No per square kilometre 0 1000 No per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.0095 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square, Bhutan or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.0099 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0096 1000 No per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square between Bhutan and New Zealand?
0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and New Zealand rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square?
Bhutan ranks 164th and New Zealand ranks 162nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs New Zealand: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-female-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-female-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/new-zealand/">Bhutan vs New Zealand: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,981 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.