Australia vs Greenland: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square

Australia
0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
189th
Greenland rank
191st

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square over time

  • Australia
  • Greenland
00.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 26.9 times Greenland's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 189th and Greenland ranks 191st of 191 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Greenland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square, Australia or Greenland?
Australia, at 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square between Australia and Greenland?
0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Greenland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Greenland rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - female, per square?
Australia ranks 189th and Greenland ranks 191st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Greenland: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-female-per-square-kilometre/australia/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-female-per-square-kilometre/australia/greenland/">Australia vs Greenland: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,981 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.