Finland vs Guatemala: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth
Finland
-0.3641 % change on previous year
in 2100
Guatemala
-0.3683 % change on previous year
in 2100
Finland rank
132nd
Guatemala rank
134th
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth over time
- Finland
- Guatemala
How they compare
Finland currently reports -0.3641 % change on previous year against -0.3683 % change on previous year in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0042 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 150 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Guatemala ahead.
Finland ranks 132nd and Guatemala ranks 134th of 227 countries.
Across the 16 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 15.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.9516 % change on previous year | 2.76 % change on previous year | 1.8 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1960s | 0.4698 % change on previous year | 2.95 % change on previous year | 2.49 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 0.2958 % change on previous year | 2.57 % change on previous year | 2.27 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 0.3863 % change on previous year | 2.83 % change on previous year | 2.44 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 0.3408 % change on previous year | 2.72 % change on previous year | 2.38 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0.2782 % change on previous year | 2.23 % change on previous year | 1.96 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.2742 % change on previous year | 1.87 % change on previous year | 1.6 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0.1088 % change on previous year | 1.48 % change on previous year | 1.37 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2030s | -0.2449 % change on previous year | 1.24 % change on previous year | 1.49 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2040s | -0.306 % change on previous year | 0.9037 % change on previous year | 1.21 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2050s | -0.3473 % change on previous year | 0.6207 % change on previous year | 0.968 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2060s | -0.3064 % change on previous year | 0.3521 % change on previous year | 0.6585 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2070s | -0.3073 % change on previous year | 0.0782 % change on previous year | 0.3854 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2080s | -0.3434 % change on previous year | -0.1547 % change on previous year | 0.1887 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2090s | -0.3386 % change on previous year | -0.3109 % change on previous year | 0.0277 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2100s | -0.3641 % change on previous year | -0.3683 % change on previous year | 0.0042 % change on previous year | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - female, annual growth, Finland or Guatemala?
- Finland, at -0.3641 % change on previous year against -0.3683 % change on previous year in Guatemala as of 2100.
- What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - female, annual growth between Finland and Guatemala?
- 0.0042 % change on previous year, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Guatemala?
- 150 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2100.
- How do Finland and Guatemala rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - female, annual growth?
- Finland ranks 132nd and Guatemala ranks 134th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.