Mauritius vs Naoero: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square

Mauritius
0.6378 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero
0.5938 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
12th
Naoero rank
14th

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square over time

  • Mauritius
  • Naoero
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.6378 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.5938 1000 No per square kilometre in Naoero, a difference of 0.044 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Naoero's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 12th and Naoero ranks 14th of 191 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Naoero Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3707 1000 No per square kilometre 0.2856 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0851 1000 No per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.4349 1000 No per square kilometre 0.3503 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0846 1000 No per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.501 1000 No per square kilometre 0.4246 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0764 1000 No per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.5668 1000 No per square kilometre 0.5033 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0635 1000 No per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.6164 1000 No per square kilometre 0.5031 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1132 1000 No per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.6445 1000 No per square kilometre 0.5408 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1037 1000 No per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.64 1000 No per square kilometre 0.5878 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0522 1000 No per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square, Mauritius or Naoero?
Mauritius, at 0.6378 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.5938 1000 No per square kilometre in Naoero as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square between Mauritius and Naoero?
0.044 1000 No per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Naoero?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Naoero rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square?
Mauritius ranks 12th and Naoero ranks 14th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Naoero: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-both-sexes-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-both-sexes-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/naoero/">Mauritius vs Naoero: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,981 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.