Guatemala vs Kiribati: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square

Guatemala
0.1691 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
0.1636 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
61st
Kiribati rank
62nd

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Kiribati
0.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.1691 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.1636 1000 No per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0055 1000 No per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.

Guatemala ranks 61st and Kiribati ranks 62nd of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Kiribati in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 0.044 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0652 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0213 1000 No per square kilometre Kiribati
1970s 0.0565 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0741 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0176 1000 No per square kilometre Kiribati
1980s 0.0726 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0821 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0095 1000 No per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 0.0951 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0998 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0047 1000 No per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 0.1209 1000 No per square kilometre 0.12 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.1476 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1435 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 No per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.1655 1000 No per square kilometre 0.1597 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0058 1000 No per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square, Guatemala or Kiribati?
Guatemala, at 0.1691 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.1636 1000 No per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square between Guatemala and Kiribati?
0.0055 1000 No per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kiribati?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Kiribati rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square?
Guatemala ranks 61st and Kiribati ranks 62nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Kiribati: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-both-sexes-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-both-sexes-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kiribati/">Guatemala vs Kiribati: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,981 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.