Greenland vs Namibia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square

Greenland
0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
191st
Namibia rank
188th

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square over time

  • Greenland
  • Namibia
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 26.4 times Greenland's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Greenland ranks 191st and Namibia ranks 188th of 191 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0002 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0029 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0033 1000 No per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square, Greenland or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0036 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 1000 No per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square between Greenland and Namibia?
0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Namibia rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square?
Greenland ranks 191st and Namibia ranks 188th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Namibia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-both-sexes-per-square-kilometre/greenland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-both-sexes-per-square-kilometre/greenland/namibia/">Greenland vs Namibia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,981 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.