Eswatini vs Mexico: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square

Eswatini
0.0715 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.0667 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
117th
Mexico rank
119th

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mexico
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0715 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0667 1000 No per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.0048 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 117th and Mexico ranks 119th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Mexico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0227 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0223 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 No per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0293 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0299 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 No per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.0409 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0382 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0563 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0463 1000 No per square kilometre 0.01 1000 No per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0625 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0541 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0084 1000 No per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0664 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0618 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0046 1000 No per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.0705 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0659 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 No per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square, Eswatini or Mexico?
Eswatini, at 0.0715 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0667 1000 No per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square between Eswatini and Mexico?
0.0048 1000 No per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Mexico rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, per square?
Eswatini ranks 117th and Mexico ranks 119th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mexico: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-both-sexes-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-total-population-both-sexes-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mexico/">Eswatini vs Mexico: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,981 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.