Naoero vs Zimbabwe: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual
Naoero
0.16 % change on previous year
in 2100
Zimbabwe
0.1887 % change on previous year
in 2100
Naoero rank
59th
Zimbabwe rank
56th
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual over time
- Naoero
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1887 % change on previous year against 0.16 % change on previous year in Naoero, a difference of 0.0287 % change on previous year.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Naoero's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 150 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Naoero ranks 59th and Zimbabwe ranks 56th of 227 countries.
Across the 16 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 15.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 3.02 % change on previous year | 3.16 % change on previous year | 0.137 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1960s | 3.99 % change on previous year | 3.2 % change on previous year | 0.7915 % change on previous year | Naoero |
| 1970s | 1.27 % change on previous year | 2.77 % change on previous year | 1.5 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 2.32 % change on previous year | 4.03 % change on previous year | 1.72 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.8224 % change on previous year | 1.8 % change on previous year | 0.974 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | -0.169 % change on previous year | 1.1 % change on previous year | 1.27 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.47 % change on previous year | 1.51 % change on previous year | 0.0427 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.6821 % change on previous year | 1.81 % change on previous year | 1.13 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2030s | 1.12 % change on previous year | 1.82 % change on previous year | 0.7007 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2040s | 1.19 % change on previous year | 1.55 % change on previous year | 0.3616 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2050s | 0.8714 % change on previous year | 1.23 % change on previous year | 0.3548 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2060s | 0.7192 % change on previous year | 0.9688 % change on previous year | 0.2497 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2070s | 0.5991 % change on previous year | 0.7557 % change on previous year | 0.1566 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2080s | 0.3934 % change on previous year | 0.5103 % change on previous year | 0.1169 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2090s | 0.2203 % change on previous year | 0.2971 % change on previous year | 0.0768 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2100s | 0.16 % change on previous year | 0.1887 % change on previous year | 0.0287 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, annual, Naoero or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.1887 % change on previous year against 0.16 % change on previous year in Naoero as of 2100.
- What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, annual between Naoero and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0287 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Zimbabwe?
- 150 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2100.
- How do Naoero and Zimbabwe rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, annual?
- Naoero ranks 59th and Zimbabwe ranks 56th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.