Djibouti vs Namibia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual
Djibouti
0.0663 % change on previous year
in 2100
Namibia
0.0916 % change on previous year
in 2100
Djibouti rank
69th
Namibia rank
66th
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual over time
- Djibouti
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0916 % change on previous year against 0.0663 % change on previous year in Djibouti, a difference of 0.0253 % change on previous year.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 150 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 66th of 227 countries.
Across the 16 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 10.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 3.25 % change on previous year | 1.36 % change on previous year | 1.89 % change on previous year | Djibouti |
| 1960s | 5.06 % change on previous year | 2.4 % change on previous year | 2.66 % change on previous year | Djibouti |
| 1970s | 8.4 % change on previous year | 2.72 % change on previous year | 5.67 % change on previous year | Djibouti |
| 1980s | 5.57 % change on previous year | 2.97 % change on previous year | 2.6 % change on previous year | Djibouti |
| 1990s | 3.37 % change on previous year | 3.26 % change on previous year | 0.1033 % change on previous year | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 2.33 % change on previous year | 1.58 % change on previous year | 0.7503 % change on previous year | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 1.79 % change on previous year | 2.47 % change on previous year | 0.6749 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2020s | 1.36 % change on previous year | 2.31 % change on previous year | 0.9479 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2030s | 1.11 % change on previous year | 1.61 % change on previous year | 0.501 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2040s | 0.8827 % change on previous year | 1.33 % change on previous year | 0.4506 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2050s | 0.7134 % change on previous year | 1.04 % change on previous year | 0.3309 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2060s | 0.5035 % change on previous year | 0.7464 % change on previous year | 0.2429 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2070s | 0.3277 % change on previous year | 0.5143 % change on previous year | 0.1867 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2080s | 0.2296 % change on previous year | 0.3366 % change on previous year | 0.107 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2090s | 0.1447 % change on previous year | 0.1529 % change on previous year | 0.0082 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2100s | 0.0663 % change on previous year | 0.0916 % change on previous year | 0.0253 % change on previous year | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, annual, Djibouti or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.0916 % change on previous year against 0.0663 % change on previous year in Djibouti as of 2100.
- What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, annual between Djibouti and Namibia?
- 0.0253 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Namibia?
- 150 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2100.
- How do Djibouti and Namibia rank globally for population - est. & proj. — total population - both sexes, annual?
- Djibouti ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 66th of 227 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.