Congo vs New Caledonia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per square kilometre

Congo
0.0055 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
154th
New Caledonia rank
157th

Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • New Caledonia
00.0020.0040.006196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0055 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Congo ranks 154th and New Caledonia ranks 157th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.003 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0035 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.0042 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 No per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.005 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 No per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0054 1000 No per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 No per square kilometre 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population - est. & proj. — rural population, per square kilometre, Congo or New Caledonia?
Congo, at 0.0055 1000 No per square kilometre against 0.0044 1000 No per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — rural population, per square kilometre between Congo and New Caledonia?
0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and New Caledonia rank globally for population - est. & proj. — rural population, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 154th and New Caledonia ranks 157th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs New Caledonia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-rural-population-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/population-est-and-proj-rural-population-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/new-caledonia/">Congo vs New Caledonia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 11,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.