Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Polynesia: Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Polynesia
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 0.4421 % change on previous year against -0.3054 % change on previous year in Polynesia, a difference of 0.7475 % change on previous year.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.4 times Polynesia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 100 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Polynesia ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Polynesia ranks 8th of 29 groups.
Across the 11 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 10 and Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1.66 % change on previous year | 1.61 % change on previous year | 0.0472 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1960s | 1.98 % change on previous year | 2.15 % change on previous year | 0.1728 % change on previous year | Polynesia |
| 1970s | 2.15 % change on previous year | 0.9457 % change on previous year | 1.2 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 2.2 % change on previous year | 0.9633 % change on previous year | 1.23 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 2.97 % change on previous year | 0.8098 % change on previous year | 2.16 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 2.23 % change on previous year | 0.4903 % change on previous year | 1.74 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 1.99 % change on previous year | 0.5518 % change on previous year | 1.44 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.61 % change on previous year | 0.4817 % change on previous year | 1.13 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2030s | 1.13 % change on previous year | 0.3066 % change on previous year | 0.8199 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2040s | 0.6819 % change on previous year | -0.1304 % change on previous year | 0.8123 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2050s | 0.4421 % change on previous year | -0.3054 % change on previous year | 0.7475 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population - est. & proj. — rural population, annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Polynesia?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 0.4421 % change on previous year against -0.3054 % change on previous year in Polynesia as of 2050.
- What is the difference in population - est. & proj. — rural population, annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Polynesia?
- 0.7475 % change on previous year, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Polynesia?
- 100 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2050.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Polynesia rank globally for population - est. & proj. — rural population, annual growth rate?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Polynesia ranks 8th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.