Asia and the Pacific vs Sao Tome and Principe: Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)

Asia and the Pacific
1.53 % change on previous year
in 2027
Sao Tome and Principe
2.6 % change on previous year
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific rank
47th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
50th

Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) over time

  • Asia and the Pacific
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-101234199120092027

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 2.6 % change on previous year against 1.53 % change on previous year in Asia and the Pacific, a difference of 1.07 % change on previous year.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.7 times Asia and the Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Asia and the Pacific ahead.

Asia and the Pacific ranks 47th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 50th of 87 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Asia and the Pacific averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 2.65 % change on previous year 2.05 % change on previous year 0.6018 % change on previous year Asia and the Pacific
2000s 2.72 % change on previous year 2.51 % change on previous year 0.2107 % change on previous year Asia and the Pacific
2010s 2 % change on previous year 2.16 % change on previous year 0.1623 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 1.25 % change on previous year 2.83 % change on previous year 1.58 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher persons outside the labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), Asia and the Pacific or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 2.6 % change on previous year against 1.53 % change on previous year in Asia and the Pacific as of 2027.
What is the difference in persons outside the labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+) between Asia and the Pacific and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.07 % change on previous year, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific and Sao Tome and Principe?
37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for persons outside the labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+)?
Asia and the Pacific ranks 47th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 50th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific vs Sao Tome and Principe: Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/persons-outside-the-labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-annual-growth-rate/asia-and-the-pacific/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/persons-outside-the-labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-annual-growth-rate/asia-and-the-pacific/sao-tome-and-principe/">Asia and the Pacific vs Sao Tome and Principe: Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
276 places, 10,188 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.