Europe and Central Asia: High income vs Hong Kong, China: Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $

Europe and Central Asia: High income
71,819
in 2027
Hong Kong, China
100,833
in 2027
Europe and Central Asia: High income rank
16th
Hong Kong, China rank
16th

Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ over time

  • Europe and Central Asia: High income
  • Hong Kong, China
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k199120092027

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 100,833 against 71,819 in Europe and Central Asia: High income, a difference of 29,014.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.4 times Europe and Central Asia: High income's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Europe and Central Asia: High income ranks 16th and Hong Kong, China ranks 16th of 87 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe and Central Asia: High income Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 49,444 51,676 2,231 Hong Kong, China
2000s 57,941 63,796 5,855 Hong Kong, China
2010s 62,881 81,161 18,281 Hong Kong, China
2020s 67,916 91,704 23,788 Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $, Europe and Central Asia: High income or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 100,833 against 71,819 in Europe and Central Asia: High income as of 2027.
What is the difference in output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $ between Europe and Central Asia: High income and Hong Kong, China?
29,014, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Central Asia: High income and Hong Kong, China?
37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
How do Europe and Central Asia: High income and Hong Kong, China rank globally for output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $?
Europe and Central Asia: High income ranks 16th and Hong Kong, China ranks 16th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe and Central Asia: High income vs Hong Kong, China: Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2015-us-ilo-modelled-estimates/europe-and-central-asia-high-income/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2015-us-ilo-modelled-estimates/europe-and-central-asia-high-income/hong-kong-sar-china/">Europe and Central Asia: High income vs Hong Kong, China: Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 10,188 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

This measure of labour productivity is calculated using data on GDP in constant 2015 US dollars derived from the World Development Indicators database of the World Bank. To compute labour productivity as GDP per worker, ILO estimates for total employment are used. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.