Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income vs China: Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $

Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income
10,188
in 2027
China
28,552
in 2027
Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income rank
65th
China rank
66th

Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ over time

  • Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income
  • China
010.0k20.0k30.0k199120092027

How they compare

China currently reports 28,552 against 10,188 in Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income, a difference of 18,364.

That makes China's figure about 2.8 times Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income ahead.

Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income ranks 65th and China ranks 66th of 87 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income averaged higher in 1 and China in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income China Difference Ahead
1990s 3,184 2,806 377.78 Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income
2000s 3,710 6,330 2,620 China
2010s 6,103 14,652 8,549 China
2020s 8,766 24,422 15,656 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $, Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income or China?
China, at 28,552 against 10,188 in Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $ between Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income and China?
18,364, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income and China?
37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
How do Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income and China rank globally for output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $?
Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income ranks 65th and China ranks 66th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income vs China: Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2015-us-ilo-modelled-estimates/central-and-western-asia-lower-middle-income/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2015-us-ilo-modelled-estimates/central-and-western-asia-lower-middle-income/china/">Central and Western Asia: Lower-middle income vs China: Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 10,188 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

This measure of labour productivity is calculated using data on GDP in constant 2015 US dollars derived from the World Development Indicators database of the World Bank. To compute labour productivity as GDP per worker, ILO estimates for total employment are used. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.