BRICS vs Latvia: Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $
BRICS
18,372
in 2027
Latvia
38,183
in 2027
BRICS rank
54th
Latvia rank
56th
Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ over time
- BRICS
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 38,183 against 18,372 in BRICS, a difference of 19,811.
That makes Latvia's figure about 2.1 times BRICS's.
Across all 37 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
BRICS ranks 54th and Latvia ranks 56th of 87 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | BRICS | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,461 | 12,669 | 8,208 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 6,771 | 21,563 | 14,792 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 11,839 | 28,867 | 17,028 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 16,424 | 35,173 | 18,749 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $, BRICS or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 38,183 against 18,372 in BRICS as of 2027.
- What is the difference in output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $ between BRICS and Latvia?
- 19,811, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for BRICS and Latvia?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
- How do BRICS and Latvia rank globally for output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $?
- BRICS ranks 54th and Latvia ranks 56th of 87 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This measure of labour productivity is calculated using data on GDP in constant 2015 US dollars derived from the World Development Indicators database of the World Bank. To compute labour productivity as GDP per worker, ILO estimates for total employment are used. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.