Asia and the Pacific: High income vs Hong Kong, China: Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $

Asia and the Pacific: High income
78,416
in 2027
Hong Kong, China
100,833
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific: High income rank
15th
Hong Kong, China rank
16th

Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: High income
  • Hong Kong, China
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k199120092027

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 100,833 against 78,416 in Asia and the Pacific: High income, a difference of 22,417.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.3 times Asia and the Pacific: High income's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Asia and the Pacific: High income ahead.

Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 15th and Hong Kong, China ranks 16th of 87 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Asia and the Pacific: High income averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: High income Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 52,472 51,676 796.59 Asia and the Pacific: High income
2000s 62,561 63,796 1,235 Hong Kong, China
2010s 70,572 81,161 10,589 Hong Kong, China
2020s 74,936 91,704 16,768 Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $, Asia and the Pacific: High income or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 100,833 against 78,416 in Asia and the Pacific: High income as of 2027.
What is the difference in output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $ between Asia and the Pacific: High income and Hong Kong, China?
22,417, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: High income and Hong Kong, China?
37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific: High income and Hong Kong, China rank globally for output per worker, gdp constant 2015 us $?
Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 15th and Hong Kong, China ranks 16th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: High income vs Hong Kong, China: Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2015-us-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-high-income/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/output-per-worker-gdp-constant-2015-us-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-high-income/hong-kong-sar-china/">Asia and the Pacific: High income vs Hong Kong, China: Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 10,188 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

This measure of labour productivity is calculated using data on GDP in constant 2015 US dollars derived from the World Development Indicators database of the World Bank. To compute labour productivity as GDP per worker, ILO estimates for total employment are used. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.